[2026:RJ-JP:24384] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9200/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16843U / 2026 Aalam S/o Liyakat Ali, R/o Village Sahsan, PS Jurhara, District Deeg. (At Present accused-Petitioner confined in Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Bharat Lal Mali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Dhakar-PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat-PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/07/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 199/2022, registered at the Police Station Jurhara, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341 and 379 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the statements of the injured-Zubaida, grievous injury on her head is alleged to have been caused by the co-accused Meejan, who has already been granted indulgence of bail by this Court vide order dated 23.11.2022 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12836/2022. Counsel submits that only the presence of the petitioner, at the place of occurrence, has been alleged by the injured. Counsel submits that the case of the present petitioner is on better footing in comparison to the co-accused person. Counsel [2026:RJ-JP:24384] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9200/2026] further submits that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.05.2026. Counsel further submits that the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner and submits that the petitioner has absconded, hence, the charge-sheet under Section 299 Cr.P.C has been submitted against him. Under these circumstances, it is prayed that the petitioner does not deserve any indulgence of bail by this Court. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that indulgence of bail has already been granted to the main accused- Meejan, against whom the allegation of causing fatal injury has been levelled by the injured and no specific overt-act has been assigned to the petitioner and also looking to the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2026 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Aalam S/o Liyakat Ali arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of [2026:RJ-JP:24384] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9200/2026] Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/22