[2026:RJ-JP:11367] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.4181/2019 Ms Ruchi Singh D/o Shri Avdesh Singh, R/o House No.1180, Sector-2, R.k. Puram, New Delhi. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Shri Bhagwan Sahai Beniwal S/o Shri Sugan Lal, R/o 73, Shri Kalyan Nagar, Ps Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur City (South), Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/03/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned FIR No.257/2019, registered with Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 504 IPC, Section 67 of the IT Act and Section 3 of SC/ST Act. 2. The contents of the instant criminal misc. petition indicate that no such incident has occurred for which the alleged FIR has been registered against the petitioner and that she has been falsely booked in the instant case. 3. This Court vide order dated 14.11.2019, while issuing notice to the respondents passed an interim order in favour of the petitioner directing her to join the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required and in the event of [2026:RJ-JP:11367] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4181/2019] her arrest, direction has been issued to grant interim bail too her furnishing personal & surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. 4. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court of the fact that on several occasions, the petitioner was called to appear before the concerned court and she has failed to appear, hence, charge-sheet could not be submitted for want of her presence. Learned counsel submits that after thorough investigation in the present matter, the alleged offence was found to be proved, hence, under these circumstances, interference of this Court is not warranted and the instant petition is liable to be rejected. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 6. Perusal of the allegations levelled in the FIR reveals commission of cognizable offence. It is settled proposition of law that if the contents of the F.I.R. reveal commission of a cognizable offence, then the correctness of the allegations cannot be adjudicated by this Court by invoking its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Hence, under these circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to take all the defence and grounds, which have been taken in the instant petition before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage of the trial. 8. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/41