SHAHBAJ KHAN @ SHALU S/O MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9645/2026 · 2026-07-06
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9378 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9378 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:25100] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9645/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17878U / 2026 Shahbaj Khan @ Shalu S/o Mohammad Hussain, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Main Road Dara Station, Police Station Kanwas, District Kota Rural (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma Ms. Kamini Pareek For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Sameer Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 06/07/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.76/2026 registered at Police Station RLY Colony, District Kota City for offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has no direct nexus in the offence alleged as is evident from averment of the complaint itself, wherein it has been mentioned that the co-accused, Mohammed Fahim, had induced the complainant to transfer a substantial amount for the purchase
[2026:RJ-JP:25100] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9645/2026] of a factory. It is further alleged that an amount of Rs. 6,28,500/- was transferred in his account. The allegation against the present petitioner is limited to the extent of the said financial transaction. Petitioner is behind the bars since 01.06.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has been filed. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Shahbaj Khan @ Shalu S/o Mohammad Hussain, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 69/Arun