- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23204-DB RFA No. 950 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 950 OF 2025 (DEC-) BETWEEN: SRI. K.SUDHAKARA REDDY S/O LATE K.RAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT “SUPARNA NILAYA”, 2ND FLOOR, VINYAS APARTMENT, MUNIRATHNA LAYOUT, KRUSHINAGARA, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NATARAJ DONKENNANAVAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRITHVI WODEYAR., ADVOCATE) AND: K.N.VEERANNA GUPTA S/O K.V.NARAYANA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O NO.389, D.V.G.ROAD, KADUR-577 548. CHIKKAMANGALORE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAHUL.B.BHOMBARE., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ONKARA.K.B., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 17.12.2024 PASSED IN OS.NO.198/2018 ON THE FILE OF PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23204-DB RFA No. 950 of 2025 AND CJM, SHIVAMOGGA., DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. 2. A Compromise Petition dated 24.04.2026 filed by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is placed on record. The parties are present before the Court and are duly identified by their respective counsel. The compromise as recorded by the parties, is as under: “3. That, with the efforts of the family friends and well- wishers both the parties and concerned persons have decided to settle the dispute amicably. Accordingly, the respondent/his son Sri.K.V.Santosh Kumar and the appellant have settled the matter. The respondent/his son Sri.K.V.Santosh Kumar have agreed to pay Rs.25,00,000/- (rupees twenty five Lakhs Only) to the appellant. The appellant has agreed to close the above - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23204-DB RFA No. 950 of 2025 appeal i.e., R.F.A. No.950/2025 in the terms enumerated in this compromise petition and also agreed not precipitate to Cheque bounce case (C.C.No.454/2018) challenged in Crl.A.No.1085/2020 and agreed to return/hand over all the original documents if any in the possession of the appellant. 4. The respondent/his son Sri.K.V.Santosh Kumar has paid Rs.25,00,000/- (rupees twenty-five Lakhs) as mentioned below: a. Rs 5,00,000/- (Five Lakhs Only) on 1.7.2025 b. Rs 10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs Only) on 11.8.2025 c. Rs 10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs Only) on 26.11.2025 5. The appellant acknowledges the receipt of the above stated amount as full and final settlement from the respondent/his son Sri.K.V.Santosh Kumar. 6. The Appellant had agreed that he will not be claiming any rights what so ever in respect of the suit schedule property in future and acknowledges the absolute ownership of the Respondent who shall be declared as the absolute owner of the schedule Property.” 3. In the above view of the matter, the compromise petition is accepted. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. 4. The Registry shall draw the decree accordingly. 5. The appellant will be permitted to withdraw the eligible Court fee, on proper identification. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23204-DB RFA No. 950 of 2025 6. All pending Interlocutory applications stand disposed of. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE KS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 5