Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9377 (ALL)

VIPIN URF VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/20265/2026 · 2026-09-17

Padam Narain Mishra, Salil Kumar Rai

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20265 of 2026 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the A.G.A. for the State. The present petition has been filed challenging the First Information Report dated 3.7.2026 in Case Crime No. 0210 of 2026 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kalan, District Shahjahanpur. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioner that the dispute as raised in the writ petition is civil in nature. It has been further argued that no offence is made out against the petitioner on the recitals made in the first information report, therefore, the first information report is liable to be quashed. The A.G.A. has opposed the writ petition. In the circumstances, we consider it appropriate and in the interest of justice to dispose of the writ petition with the direction that the petitioner shall not be arrested in pursuance to the first information report dated 3.7.2026 in Case Crime No. 0210 of 2026 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kalan, District Shahjahanpur till submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C./193(3) B.N.S.S. provided the petitioner cooperates in the investigation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. September 18, 2026 Satyam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Bhan Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Vipin Urf Vipin Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad