[2026:RJ-JP:25049] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10184/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18901U / 2026 Ramavtar S/o Banshidhar, R/o Village Sujata Wala Kua, Post Singhana, Tehsil Bhuwana, District Jhunjhunu, Presently Van Rakshak Chowki, Laxmipura, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined in Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/07/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 162/2026, registered at the Police Station C.P.S Jaipur, District ACB District for the offences punishable under Section 7 of the PC Act, 1988 and Section 61(2) of BNS. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no evidence against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged incident. Counsel submits that neither the petitioner has made any demand of bribe, nor any recovery at the instance of the petitioner has been affected. Counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant case. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.06.2026 and trial will take [2026:RJ-JP:25049] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10184/2026] its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submits that the factum of demand of bribe has been established from the transcript of conversation of the petitioner with the complainant and there is a recovery of Rs. 5000/- at the instance of the petitioner in the presence of the complainant. He further submits that the matter is still at investigation stage, hence, the petitioner does not deserve any indulgence of bail. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments raised by learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the fact that matter is still at investigation stage, hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of investigation and after submission of charge-sheet. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/39