IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 41 of 2026 Decided on : 11.05.2026 Rajesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr.Goldy Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.1/State. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) The objection raised by the Registry has not been removed despite lapse of four months and no plausible reason has been assigned for non-removing the objection, therefore, in these circumstances, the present petition is dismissed for non-removal of objection. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original compromise deed annexed with the petition be returned to the the petitioner. Prayer accepted. Original compromise deed is ordered to be returned to the petitioner as per rules. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 11th May, 2026. (ravinder)