[2026:RJ-JP:24631] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9389/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17281U / 2026 Ajim @ Ajji S/o Shahabdeen, Age 36 Years, Resident of Bhagor Police Station Jairoli Police At Present Ward No. 11 Tijara At Present Abad Bhur Pahari Road Police Station Kisangarhbas Distict Khairthal-Tijara. (At Present Confined Sub-Jail Kisangarhbas) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 02/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 168/2025 registered at Police Station Tijara, District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) under Sections 132, 109(1), 61(2)(a) of BNS and under Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long; that co-accused person has already been enlarge on bail by the trial Court itself. He further submits that no one has sustained any injury; that there are twelve cases registered against the accused- [2026:RJ-JP:24631] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9389/2026] petitioner, out of which only four cases are pending; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and arguments advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been filed; that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 13.05.2026; that co-accused person Rahul has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court iteself vide order dated 22.04.2025; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Ajim @ Ajji S/o Shahabdeen is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:24631] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9389/2026] 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the concerned police station once in a month. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 105/SHIVANI