MAHESH @ KALLA S/O VIDHARAM, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7358/2026 · 2026-07-06
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9370 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9370 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:25031] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7358/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13389U / 2026 Mahesh @ Kalla S/o Vidharam, Resident Of Village Dhwajpura, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (Currently In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Dushyant Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 06/07/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.104/2026 registered at Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 352, 109(1), 303(2) of BNS,
2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that there is a cross-case between the parties. He further submits that, although an allegation has been levelled against the present petitioner of causing life-threatening injuries, his name does not find mention
[2026:RJ-JP:25031] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7358/2026] in the FIR, and no specific overt act has been attributed to him. He contends that there is no medical opinion on record to establish that the injured sustained any life-threatening injury. Petitioner is behind the bars since 27.04.2026 without any criminal past. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mahesh @ Kalla S/o Vidharam, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/35