HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37865 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of private respondent is taken on record. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent specifically the respondent no.2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's application dated 28.8.2025 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) which relates to reject the proceeding under section 30(2) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 and may take action against the respondent no.5 and 6 about their forgery and false affidavit by passing speaking a reasoned order within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. This Court directed the learned Standing Counsel to obtain instruction in the matter. 4. Learned Counsel for private respondent submitted that proceeding under Section 30 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been decided finally by Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) Jaunpur vide order dated 17.11.2025, as such, the instant petition has become infructuous. He further placed the order dated 17.11.2025 which is annexed as annexure no. SA1 to the supplementary affidavit. 5. Considering the fact that proceeding under Section 30 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been finally decided vide order dated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niraj Tiwari, Rohit Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Harish Kumar Srivastava, Shivanand Mishra Rampa Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 17.11.2025, the instant petition cannot be entertained. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as infructous. September 21, 2026 Vandana Y. WRIC No. 37865 of 2025 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad