- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19667 WP No. 13769 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 13769 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI N.SWAMY S/O LATE P.NARASHIMMAYYA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT HOLENARASIPURA TOWN HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201 2. SRI.ASHWATHANARAYANA S/O LATE P.NARASHIMMAYYA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT HOLENARASIPURA TOWN HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201 3. SRI H.N.RAAMU S/O LATE P.NARASHIMMAYYA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HOLENARASIPURA TOWN HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201 4. H.N.KRISHNA S/O LATE P. NARASHIMMAYYA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HOLENARASIPURA TOWN HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIKAS M., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19667 WP No. 13769 of 2022 AND: 1. GENERAL SECRETARY RAILWAY BOARD ROOM NO.227, RAILWAY BHAVAN -1 NEW DELHI-110 001 2. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION NEAR RAILWAY MUSEUM YADAVAGIRI MYSORE 3. ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF RAILWAY DCF RAILWAY OFFICE YADAVAGIRI MYSORE …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA U., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTION NOT TO DISTURB THE PEACEFULL POSSESSION OF THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY IN SY.NO.186/2 AND SY.NO.193 OF KOTE VAKKARANE BAVI BEDI, HOLENARASIPURA TOWN, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19667 WP No. 13769 of 2022 ORAL ORDER The writ petition is filed in the year 2022. There is no interim order in this writ petition. When the matter came up before this court on 18.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed for ‘dismissal’ on 08.04.2026. Today when the matter came up under the caption for ‘dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the *writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58 * Corrected vide chamber order dated:30/04/2026.