Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9368 (ALL)

INSAD ALI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/11879/2026 · 2026-09-20

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11879 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari and quash the impugned First Information Report dated 12.05.2026 (filed as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition) registered as Case Crime No. 0253 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 333, 308(5), 329(3) BNS, Police Station Surajpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to not to arrest the petitioner pursuant to the impugned First Information Report dated 12.05.2026 (filed as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition) registered as Case Crime No. 0253 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 333, 308(5), 329(3) BNS, Police Station Surajpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3 has apprised the Court that notice of the case has been served upon learned counsel for the petitioner through WhatsApp, in support whereof the relevant document has been placed on record and is taken on record. 3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghan Shyam Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dinesh Rai, G.A., Stuti Rai Insad Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted to the court concerned. 4. Heard Mr. Dinesh Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the material on record. 5. Taking into consideration the non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted to the court concerned, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication. 6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 21, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 11879 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad