Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9364 (UTT)

SMT. ANJUM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1820/2020 · 2026-08-04

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010100252020 2026:UHC:6834 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1815/2020 Smt. Neelu --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent With WPMS/1278/2020 WPMS/1820/2020 Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Ms. Suraiya Naz, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Ms. Swati Verma and Mr. Pan Singh Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Vritant Bhatt, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondent no. 5.. 4. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, they are clubbed together and are being heard & decided by a common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of WPMS/1815/2020 alone are being considered and discussed. 5. Petitioner was elected as Member Zila Panchayat, Vide order dated 21.07.2020, passed by Director, Panchayati Raj, she was put under suspension. UKHC010100252020 2026:UHC:6834 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was elected for a term of five years and upon expiry of her term, the Zila Panchayat has been re- constituted in 2025. Thus, she submits that writ petition has become infructuous. 7. In view of the statement made, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 04.08.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DA AB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.04 17:59:44 +05'30'