SAFEEK MOHD AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/34995/2026 · 2026-09-22
Vivek Saran
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9364 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9364 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34995 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. Heard Sri Deep Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The sole grievance of the petitioners is that the State respondents are trying to make chak marg over Gata No. 391, which is recorded in the name of the petitioners, without any notice or any procedure. He further states that the petitioners have ventilated their grievances to the District Magistrate/respondent no. 2 by means of a representation dated 04.08.2026 and the same is pending consideration.
3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the said representation shall be decided expeditiously.
4. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 04.08.2026, filed as Annexure-3 to the instant writ petition, within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order along with self attested copy of the instant writ petition.
5. As an interim measure, for a period of one month or till the said representation is decided, the State respondents shall not proceed to dispossess the petitioners from Gata No. 391. September 23, 2026 gp Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deep Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh (Vivek Saran,J.) Safeek Mohd And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad