Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9359 (DEL)

MD MEHOOB HASAN & ORS. v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./3886/2026 · 2026-05-18

Saurabh Banerjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3886/2026, CRL.M.A. 15763/2026-Exp MD MEHOOB HASAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Alok Dev, Mr. Anupam Singh, and Mr. Rahul Khokal, Advs. alongwith petitioners in person Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs. alongwith ASI Jaswant, SI B. Panwar PS Sultan Puri Mr. Arvind Kr. and Ms. Mini Mishra, Advs. for R-2 alongwith R- 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 18.05.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No.1202/2020 dated 29.10.2020 registered at PS.: Sultanpuri, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) as also all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Settlement dated 06.03.2026 (Annexure P3), whereby the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 have mutually resolved their disputes. 2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 15:29:24 3. Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms the terms of the aforesaid Settlement dated 06.03.2026. She submits that in compliance thereof the petitioner no.1 has already paid her the total settlement amount of Rs.1,00,000/- as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc. She further submits that she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 4. The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials as on record, have been identified by the Investigating Officer. 5. Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, they shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility. 6. Thus, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.1202/2020 dated 29.10.2020 registered at PS.: Sultanpuri, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/ 34 of the IPC as also all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 15:29:24 7. Accordingly, the present petition, along with the pending application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J. MAY 18, 2026/rr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 15:29:24