Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 93582 (MAD)

Sundaramoorthy v. The State of Tamil Nadu

CRL OP(MD)/11870/2025 · 2026-02-17

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.11870 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/02/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.11870 of 2025 Sundaramoorthy ... Petitioner/A2 Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By, the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District. (Crime No.8 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervener : Mr.A.Arul Jenifer PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.8 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police... 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.11870 of 2025 ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 405, 418 and 420 of IPC, in Crime No.8 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused received a sum of Rs.1,60,00,000/- from the defacto complainant for securing license to operate hotel along with an AC Bar. Thereafter, they failed to return the same with interest. Hence, the complaint. 3. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner and other accused received a sum of Rs.1,60,00,000/- from the defacto complainant for securing license to operate hotel along with an AC 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.11870 of 2025 Bar. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the seriousness of the offence committed by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. (S S Y J) 17.02.2026 vsg TO 1.TheInspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.11870 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY,J., vsg ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11870 of 2025 Date : 17/02/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis