Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9358 (JHR)

SAHDEO GOPE ALIAS YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./978/2026 · 2026-03-18

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7397 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 978 of 2026 ----- Sahdeo Gope @ Yadav, S/o Late Huro Yadav @ Horo Gope, R/o Sihodih, P.O. Sirsia, P.S. Giridih (M), District- Giridih .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, AddI. P.P. …...... 02/ 18.03.2026: This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 364 and 379 of IPC. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Leaned AddI. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. 4. The prosecution story as appears from the F.I.R. is that petitioner along with others had waylaid, the informant and his son, who were returning from marriage ceremony. They taking them to Jhirihri mohalla and stabbed with sharp knife, due to the assault, they fell down. Thereafter, the accused persons fled away. 5. Petitioner relies upon some of the orders passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court, but I do not find any consideration in these orders upon which, the bails were granted. Only on submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner the bails were granted. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the persons are agnates. 7. The person being agnates does not give a licence to one person to stab another. 8. There is an allegation is that the petitioner and others attacked the injured with knife and stab blow was given. The injury report suggests that there was stabbing wound on the injured and use of sharp edge weapon i.e. knife exhibiting fatal intention on the part of the petitioner. 9. Considering the material at this stage, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.132 of 2022, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, stands rejected. 10. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed. 11. Petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail, after examination of the victim. 18th March, 2026 (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./ Uploaded on 19/03/2026