Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ( 2026:HHC:15695 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 211 of 2026
Decided on: 11.05.2026 ________________________________________________ Neeraj Kumar ....Petitioner Versus
Devesh Kumar & Ors.
…Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rishabh Negi, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) As per compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, the petitioner has been reinstated in the service with immediate effect from the date of dismissal i.e.
26.08.2015.
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:15695 )
3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law.
4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
( Sushil Kukreja )
11th May, 2026 Judge (raman)