457.2012CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 5 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 457 OF 2012 IN WP/5289/2011 SIDRAM TULSIRAM MASKE AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS ... AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs. U.S. Bhosale Advocate for Respondent no.3 : Mr.Rohit Patwardhan h/f Mr.Sangle S.G. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 15.09.2026 ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.): 1. None for the petitioners. 2. Respondent no.3 has filed affidavit-in-reply and has stated that the amount of rental compensation is deposited on 09.12.2013. With the passage of time, it is presumed that the petitioners must have withdrawn that amount. 3. In view of the affidavit-in-reply of respondent no.3, the order under contempt is complied with. 4. Even otherwise, the petition is not even circulated from 2013. Thus, it appears that the grievance of the petitioners must have been redressed. 5. In view of the above, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty that if at all the petitioners are aggrieved by the quantum of amount determined by 2026:BHC-AUG:42460 457.2012CP 2 respondent, it would be open for the petitioners to agitate the grievance by availing the appropriate remedy under law. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga