Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 935 (PNJ)

MUNEESH BABBAR v. ANURAG RASTOGI, IAS

COCP/919/2026 · 2026-04-06

Vikas Bahl

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 COCP No.919 of 2026 Date of decision: April 6th, 2026 Muneesh Babbar .....Petitioner Versus Anurag Rastogi, IAS .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Pratap Singh Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submitted that in pursuance of the order dated 12.08.2025 passed by the coordinate Bench, a detailed speaking order dated 03.04.2026 has been passed and thus, the present contempt petition be disposed of. 2. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of. April 6th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.04.06 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh