IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13342 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== Irfan Ansari @ Md Irfan Ansari Son of Jawed Ansari Resident of Village - Pir Bigha, Police Station - Chakand in the district of Gaya Ji. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Renuka Ratnakar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 01-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No.278 of 2025, for having allegedly committed offences under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 352 and 351(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, on the written application submitted by the informant before the S.H.O. of Chakand police station with an allegation that while he was constructing his wall on his land, all the accused persons including the petitioner came and started abusing him and attacked him. The petitioner is said to have gave a sword blow on his head, as a result of which, he sustained injury and fell down and other accused persons assaulted the informant with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13342 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026 2/3 Lathi, Danda and co-accused, Neyaz Ansari is alleged to have snatched Rs.20,000/- and a chain made of gold from the informant. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties are Gotiyas and there is an admitted land dispute between the parties. The alleged occurrence has taken place in the spur of the moment and the injury found on the person of the informant is simple in nature. It is also submitted that the petitioner has got clean antecedent. 5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Having considered the rival submissions and from perusal of the injury report, which was called for vide order dated 26.02.2026, it would transpire that in the opinion of the doctor, the injuries were caused by hard and blunt substance and are simple in nature, further the petitioner and the informant are Gotiyas and there is an admitted land dispute in between them, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Gaya Ji in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13342 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026 3/3 connection with Chakand P.S. Case No.278 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a further condition that:- The learned court concerned shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. Sanjay/- (Ritesh Kumar, J.) U T