Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9348 (PAT)

Bhulla Kumar @ Bhulla @ Bholu Kumar @ Bholu v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./14119/2026 · 2026-02-25

R P Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14119 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Bhulla Kumar @ Bhulla @ Bholu Kumar @ Bholu S/o Punjabi Das @ Panjabi Das R/o vill- Malikpur, Malikpur Rustampur, P.S. - Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.) , District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravish Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 329 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and u/s 274, 275 and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total total 300 litres of liquor was recovered from two motorcycles. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Santosh Kumar @ Shantosh Kumar. The petitioner has got no concern with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14119 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is not the owner of the said two motorcycles. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, contends that prima-facie no case is made out against the petitioner. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 329 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. manish/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T