Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9346 (CAL)

DEBASIS MAITRA v. RATHENDRA RAMAN, CHAIRMAN, CDLB AND ORS.

CPAN/340/2026 · 2026-04-17

Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.04.2026 Court No.13 Item No.3 AP CPAN 340 of 2026 (not found in the file) In WPA 17699 of 2023 Debasis Maitra Vs. Rathendra Raman, Chairman, Calcutta Dock Labour Board & Ors. Mr. Rabilal Moitra, Senior Advocate Mr. Subhadeep Moitra Mr. S. Chatterjeee … For the petitioner/applicant. Mr. Ashok Kumar Jena …. For the alleged contemnors. 1. Mr. Jana appears for the alleged contemnors. Vakalatnama filed by him is kept with the record. 2. Mr. Jana submits that the commutation of pension is not part of either writ petition or this Court’s order. 3. This Court is in agreement with Mr. Jana’s submission. 4. Having regard to the above, this Court is of the view that if there is any inequality being meted out to the writ petitioner in so far as commutation of pension is concerned, he may agitate the same in an independent writ petition. 5. With the aforesaid observations, CPAN 340 of 2026 is disposed of. Consequently, all connected pending applications, if any, are also disposed of. 2 6. Personal presence of the alleged contemnors, if any, is dispensed with. 7. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. 8. There shall be no order as to costs. 9. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)