Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9343 (RAJ)

GHANSHYAM @ BHALU S/O SHRAWAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8934/2026 · 2026-07-04

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24934] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8934/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16395U / 2026 Ghanshyam @ Bhalu S/o Shrawan Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Raigaro Ka Mohalla, Sambhar Lake, Police Station Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shrawan Lal father of petitioner is present in person For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Devi Singh, PP and Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 04/07/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.222/2025 registered at Police Station Phulera (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard father of the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Mr. Shrawan Lal father of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 22.12.2025. Though ten criminal cases have been registered against him, he has been granted bail in all of those cases. It is further submitted that the present case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will [2026:RJ-JP:24934] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8934/2026] take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by father of the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ghanshyam @ Bhalu S/o Shrawan Lal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Phulera (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. [2026:RJ-JP:24934] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8934/2026] (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 15/Arun