JOTINATH RATANNATH JOGI (DIED) THROUGH LRS MARUTI JOTINATH JOGI. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS.
CA/10514/2026 · 2026-09-10
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9343 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9343 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 925-CA-10514-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10514 OF 2026 IN FA/2404/2026 Jotinath Ratannath Jogi (died) Thr. Lrs Maruti Jotinath Jogi. VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Thr. The Dist Collector Osmanabad And Ors. ... Mr. Ingale Vivekanand V. for the Applicant. Ms.Preeti Diggikar, AGP for the Respondent/State. ...
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 10.09.2026 PER COURT :
1. While deciding the Civil Application seeking condonation of delay in filing the present Appeal, this Court condoned the delay, subject to the condition that the Applicant shall pay costs of Rs.5,000/- in each Appeal to the Respondent/Acquiring Body within a period of four weeks from the date of the said order. The said order was passed by this Court on 25th February, 2026.
2. The learned Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant submits that he had approached the office of the Additional Collector for depositing the amount of costs as directed by this Court. However, the said amount was not accepted on the ground that there was a delay in depositing the costs. Hence, the present Application has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to accept the amount of costs as
directed by this Court. Sunny Thote 2026:BHC-AUG:42558
2 925-CA-10514-2026.odt
3. In view of the above, the time to deposit the amount of costs is extended by a further period of two weeks.
4. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clauses [A] and [B] and according the same is disposed off.
[ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ] Sunny Thote