1 905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 292 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 292 OF 2011 IN WP/5050/2009 RENUKADEVI SHIKSHAN PRASRAK SANSTHA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR I.R.CHAUDHARI VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... Adv. Deepali Nikalje h/f Adv. A. G. Talhar, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State Adv. N. D. Sonawane h/f Adv. S. S. Bora, Advocate for respondent No. 2. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 11/09/2026 ORDER ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) :- . In the order under contempt, this Court has directed that in case the petitioner files an appeal within four weeks from the date of order, the Appellate Authority shall furnish the comments offered by the State Government to the petitioner, who may file his objections, if any. The competent authority then shall pass order either declining or granting recognition to the petitioner-institution in accordance with law and its policy. The Appellate Authority shall not dismiss the appeal on the ground that the State had forwarded negative recommendation. 2026:BHC-AUG:42536 2 905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 292 OF 2011 2. The proposal of the petitioner was for opening D.Ed college for the academic year 2007-08. 3. Since the proposal was for the year 2007-08, with the passage of time, the subject matter of the petition has become infructuous and the same stands disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/