Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9337 (ALL)

JAGDISH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/36565/2026 · 2026-09-20

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36565 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief: "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents concerned to consider on the representation dated 22.06.2026, 23.06.2026 and 01.07.2026 and restrain the private respondents not to take possession over the abadi land of the petitioner by use of illegal force and colluding with the police." 3. From the perusal of the pleadings raised in the writ petition and the documents brought on record, it clearly transpires that petitioner has already litigating the matter in civil suit being O.S. No.- 593 of 2023 for permanent prohibitory injunction. 4. In the circumstances, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter. 5. However, liberty rests with the petitioner to pursue the remedy in civil suit, if so advised. 6. Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 21, 2026 Atmesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Jagdish .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad