Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9334 (ALL)

UMESHANKAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/37528/2026 · 2026-09-17

Ajit Kumar, Siddharth Nandan

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37528 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner wants protection of his rights as to the possession under the lawful decree passed by the court of competent jurisdiction dated 21.05.2025 in Original Suit No. 122 of 2026. In our considered view, petitioner should apply for execution of the decree, if so advised. Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 18, 2026 IrfanUddin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Mohan, Sanjay Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Umeshankar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad