SYED CHAND PASHA @ CHANDPASHA @ CHANDU BA @ CHAND v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.RP/368/2026 · 2026-03-04
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9330 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9330 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13367 CRL.RP No. 368 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 368 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
SYED CHAND PASHA @ CHANDPASHA @ CHANDU BA @ CHAND S/O SYED AKMAL PASHA @ AKMAL, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.13/8, 8TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, VALMIKI NAGAR, BANDE GUDISALU, MYSORE ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE CITY-18 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOWTHAMA.V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MOHANKUMARA D., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WEST DIVISION, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SRI. ANIL KUMAR. R POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR, CHAMARAJPET PS, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13367 CRL.RP No. 368 of 2026
3.
CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON PARAPPANA AGRAHARA, BENGALURU - 560 100. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.02.2026 IN REFERENCE NO.CRM/MGM/1085/DCP(P)/2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1, ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER
Office has raised the issue of maintainability of the petition.
2.
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo dated 04.03.2026. Memo reads as under:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13367 CRL.RP No. 368 of 2026
"The Revision Petitioner herein prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the Revision Petitioner to withdraw the above petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate Court. Hence this memo for withdrawal".
3. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. Time spent before this Court shall be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act in the intended petition before the appropriate Court. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11