*1* 6revn53o21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 53 OF 2021 PANKAJ NAVAL BAVISKAR VERSUS NUTAN @ RUPALI PANKAJ BAVISKAR ... Shri Deshmukh Anand I., Advocate for the Applicant. ... CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 15 September 2026 (Through VC) P. C. :- 1. Heard. 2. The applicant/ husband is challenging the order dated 14.02.2020 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Jalgaon in Petition No.E-238/2019 (Old Criminal M.A. No.360/2018) whereby, he has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.3500/- per month to the respondent/ wife from the date of the petition i.e. 10.05.2018. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is an agriculturist and as such, the amount of maintenance is too excessive. The matter requires consideration 2026:BHC-AUG:42717 *2* 6revn53o21 and therefore, the notice be issued to the respondent/ wife. 4. Upon specific query as to whether, the applicant/ husband is regularly paying the said amount of Rs.3500/- to the respondent/ wife, the learned advocate fails to give any satisfactory answer. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant revision application. Moreover, the maintenance of Rs.3500/- per month is not at all exorbitant. So also, on perusal of the reasons recorded by the Court below, I do not find any perversity, manifest illegality or non- consideration of material evidence warranting interference in revisional jurisdiction. 5. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )