Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12714 WP No. 7520 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 7520 OF 2024 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SAJJAPPA S/O MOTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/OF SULADENAHALLI VILLAGE, VEMAGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK – 563 101.
2.
SMT. MUNIYALAGAMMA W/O MUNISHAMY @ MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT SULADENAHALLIL VILLAGE, VEMGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK – 563 101
3.
SRI. VENKATASWAMY S/O LATE DASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/OF MANCHANDAHALLI VILLAGE, VEMAGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK – 563 101
4.
SMT. PILAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/OF MANCHANDAHALLI VILLAGE, VEMGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK – 563 101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJASHEKARA H.M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12714 WP No. 7520 of 2024 AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR – 563 101
3.
THE TAHSILDAR KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR – 563 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K.P.YOGANNA, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TODIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REGRANT OF THE LANDS COPIES OF WHICH ARE PRODUCED AT ANNX-C E F AND G RESPECTIVELY UNDER KARNATAKA CERTAIN INAMS ABOLITION ACT 1977 AND DISPOSE THEM OFF EXPEDITIOUSLY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 16.02.2026, the following order was passed:
"Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioners for compliance of office objections, failing which, the writ petition shall be listed for dismissal on 02.03.2026."
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12714 WP No. 7520 of 2024
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2