Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9324 (UTT)

LEELA JOSHI v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTRICT NAINITAL

WPMS/184/2023 · 2026-08-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010008622023 2026:UHC:7116 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/184/2023 Leela Joshi --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate District Nainital --Respondent Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that in terms of order dated 13.01.2023, passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court, land belonging to petitioner was demarcated by Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned, on 28.01.2023 & 29.01.2023 respectively. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.08.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c 0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9 A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.12 10:43:10 +05'30'