LEELA JOSHI v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTRICT NAINITAL
WPMS/184/2023 · 2026-08-11
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9324 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9324 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010008622023
2026:UHC:7116 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/184/2023
Leela Joshi --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate District Nainital --Respondent
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Learned State Counsel submits that in terms of order dated 13.01.2023, passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court, land belonging to petitioner was demarcated by Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned, on 28.01.2023 & 29.01.2023 respectively.
4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.08.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c 0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9 A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.12 10:43:10 +05'30'