Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9322 (ORI)

NIKHIL NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/3596/2026 · 2026-05-05

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 3596 of 2026 1. Nikhil Nayak 2.Akhil Nayak …. Petitioners Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 05.05.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioners are accused in connection with G.R. Case No.1081 of 2025, pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., (Cog-II), Puri, arising out of Baselisahi P.S. Case No.272 of 2025, for commission of alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 3(5) of B.N.S. Act, 2023. 3. Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioners relating to the aforementioned P.S. case is pending in any other Court. 4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.483 of BNSS by the learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Puri, by order dated 30.03.2026 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed. p. 2 5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that taking into account the nature of allegations and since the charge sheet has already been filed, they may be released on bail. 6. Learned counsel for the State opposes such prayer in view of the injury suffered by the injured and that the Petitioners have criminal proclivity. 7. This Court perused the statement of the injured Priyansu Panda and also his injury report indicating that he has suffered five injuries including on his vital part and all the injuries have been categorized as grievous. 8. Considering the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail application at this stage. 9. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to renew his prayer before the learned Court in seisin after examination of the injured, which shall be considered on its own merits without being influenced by the earlier rejection or the order passed by this Court. 10. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya Designation: Jr. Stenographer