Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9321 (RAJ)

ARCHNA D/O PRAHALAD SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10709/2026 · 2026-07-02

Inderjeet Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24427] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10709/2026 URN: CW / 23718U / 2026 1. Archna D/o Prahalad Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Mahlana Dekhnada Po-Mahalana Uttrada, Churu Rajasthan. Presently Working As Assistant Professor Sociology In Smt. Mohani Devi Chachan Government Collage Sahwa Churu Rajasthan. 2. Subodh Prakash S/o Hemant Kumar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Panchwati Colony, Hospital Road Baran Rajasthan. Presently Working As Assistant Professor Eafm In Government Pg Collage Jaitaran Rajasthan. 3. Surabhi Sharma D/o Jitendra Kumar Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 49/flat No. 101 Prithvi Raj Nagar Maharani Farm Durgapura Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 3. Principal, Smt. Mohani Devi Chachan Government Collage, Sahwa Churu Rajasthan.. 4. Principal, Government Pg Collage, Jaitaran 5. Principal, Government Girls Collage, Vidyadhar Nagar Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mithun Bhai Chaturvedi Mr. Rohit Kumar Tuteja For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chinmaya Saxena, AGC and Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 02/07/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue is governed by the Division Bench Judgment of this Court (Jaipur) in [2026:RJ-JP:24427] (2 of 2) [CW-10709/2026] D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 903/2023; State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (decided on 19.09.2025). 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Department does not refute the above fact. He submits that the petition be disposed of in light of the same directions as issued in Ram Chaturvedi(supra). 3. In Ram Chaturvedi(supra) the Court directed as under :- “…….we deem it just and proper to dispose of these appeals and modify the judgment dated 23.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge as follows:- (1) The respondent/original petitioner/applicants are entitled to continue on their respective posts till they are replaced by existing regular employees or regularly selected candidates through RPSC. (2) The respondents/original petitioners/ applicants would be continued on their posts provided that sufficient number of students are available for the particular courses(s) for which they were appointed. (3) The respondents/original petitioners/ applicants would be entitled to honorarium at the rate of Rs.800/- per hour as is being paid to them presently or to be modified by the State from time to time. With the above modification, the present appeals are disposed of.” 4. The present writ petition is disposed of on the same terms and conditions as above. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (REKHA BORANA),J 9/SHIVAM