HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13859 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Shri Vijay Singh Sengar, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has already filed a petition being Writ-A No.8123 of 2024 (Umesh Kumar Dwivedi vs. State of U.P. and 4 others), seeking to release of honorarium; and admittedly that an enquiry regarding appointments of teachers on temporary basis, is pending. 3. It is an admitted case of the petitioner that his engagement as Assistant Teacher in government aided Sanskrit Institution was on temporary basis; but however, now there is an advertisement being issued seeking appointment against the vacancies on permanent basis. 4. The case is of the petitioner is that no appointments can be made on permanent basis, unless the honorarium to which he is entitled, is released in his favour. He does not dispute that the advertisement is for appointment against a sanctioned vacancy on permanent basis; and it is not the case of the petitioner that an adhoc employee is being replaced by another adhoc employee. 5. Apart from the aforesaid, no other ground has been pressed by the counsel for the petitioner, while assailing the impugned order of appointment dated 09.07.2026; and only a request has been made to connect the present writ petition with Writ-A No.8123 of 2024. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Umesh Kumar Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. This Court is of the view that reliefs claimed in both the writ petitions are distinct in nature and no grounds have been taken, demonstrating any illegality in the Advertisement, by the petitioner, while assailing the impugned advertisement dated 09.07.2026; and merely because there is some dispute regarding release of the payment of honorarium, fresh appointment cannot be stalled; further more, there is an enquiry pending regarding the appointment of teachers on temporary basis, which is a subject matter in the pending writ petition (supra). 7. In view of the aforesaid, no good ground has been made for interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, accordingly, the present writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed. 8. However, dismissal of the present writ petition will not be an impediment in the pending writ petition, which is for the release of honorarium payment, for the work done by the petitioner. September 21, 2026 S.Prakash WRIA No. 13859 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad