Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 932 (GAU)

NABADWEEP PATHAK v. NIKUNJ HARLALKA

Crl.Pet./47/2026 · 2026-02-18

Mitali Thakuria

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010007502026 2026:GAU-AS:2497 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./47/2026 NABADWEEP PATHAK S/O UPENDRANATH PATHAK A RESIDEN TOF C/O DR. AMENG THAM,WARD NO. 12, SALBAGAN, OPP. MEGHANA HYNDAI SHOWROOM, CHAPAGURI ROAD, NORTH BONGAIGAON, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS NIKUNJ HARLALKA CO- PARTNER AND AUTHORIZED PERSON OF SHIFUNG CONSTRUCTION SON OF PREM NATH HARLALKA A RESIDENT OF BONGAIGAON FLOUR MILLS, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MAYURI BHUYAN, Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 19-02-2026 Heard Ms. M. Bhuyan, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Page No.# 2/2 It is submitted by her that as per instruction of her client she wants to withdraw the same with a liberty to file afresh. She further submitted that there are some vital documents which could not be annexed along with the petition as well as there are some formal defects in the petition and for which she wants to withdraw the same with a liberty to file afresh. Prayer is allowed. The case is disposed of accordingly on withdrawal with a liberty to file afresh, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant