THE SOCIETY OF TRUSTEES OF INDIGENOUS CHURCHES IN INDIA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/27087/2021 · 2026-09-07
Sunitha Gandham
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9319 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9319 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010435762021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27087/2021 Between:
1. THE SOCIETY OF TRUSTEES OF INDIGENOUS CHURCHES IN INDIA, THE SOCIETY OF TRUSTEES OF INDIGENOUS CHURCHES IN INDIA, REGD. NO. 114/1971, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON, R. VEERA CHARY, S/O NARASAIAH, AGE 52 YEARS, HEBRON CHURCH, R/O. 1-1-574, GOLCONDA CROSS ROADS, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD, TS 500 020. 2. M. SUVARNA PAUL ALIAS SUVARNA RAO, S/O PAUL (LAGE), OCC GODS SERVANT/PASTOR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 27-10-26, ZION PRAYER HOUSE, 1ST LANE, KANNAVARITHOTA, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINICIPAL SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SUPERNINDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARPALLEM POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. GURRAM PRASADA RAO, S/O. DEVADANAM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O 7-17-385/A, 2ND LANE, RATNAPURI COLONY, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR. 5. KARRI ABRAHAM LINCOLN, , S/O. RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O 1ST LANE, KANNAVARITHOTA, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR. 6. VARIKURI VAMSAVARDHAN REDDY, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 205, SRI SAI HOMES, 1ST LANE,
2
VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR
7. SEELI DEVAVARAM, S/O. SAMUEL, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.97-2-47, 1ST LANE, KANNAVARITHOTA, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR. 8. DARSI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O LAKSHMI NARUSU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 26-34-22/4, 9/2, A.T. AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or directic, or writ of MANDAMUS, questioning the inaction of the respondents No 2 and 3 in not granting police aid to the petitioners to see that ad-interim injunction order granted by this Honble Court in Receive and Transmit Petition No 1/2021 dated 12-10-2021 is implemented inspite of the representation dated 15-10-2021 as illegal, arbitrary, abdication of duties and consequently direct the respondents No 2 and 3 to give police aid to see that ad-interim injunction order is implemented in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners dated: 15-10-2021 and act accordingly in view of the ad-interim injunction order in Receive and Transmit Petition No. 1/2021 dated: 12-10-2021 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass all necessary orders for the said purpose. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K V BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. PRABHU NATH VASIREDDY
3. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27087/2021
ORDER:
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that cause does not survive and as such this writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
2.
Learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 also submitted the same.
3. Recorded the said submissions.
4. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 08.09.2026 SSA/CJP
4
59 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 27087/2021
Date: 08.09.2026 SSA/CJP