Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9318 (KAR)

ANANDA. R v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/25933/2023 · 2026-02-24

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11383 WP No. 25933 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 25933 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. ANANDA. R S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 2. VENKATESH N S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 195 M.M. ROAD, P.K. STORE ANIF SAB COMPOUND, GANGAMMA TEMPLE, KADUGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 067. 3. GOPAL A S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS MARKET ROAD NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE PLANATATION, KADUGUDI BANGALORE - 560 067. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARASIMHAIAH K, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11383 WP No. 25933 of 2023 AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH TALUK (EAST) - 560 070. 2. THE THASILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 067. 3. H. MUNISHAMAPPA RESIDING KADUGUDI BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE - 560 067. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-A, B AND C AND DIRECTION TO BE GIVEN THASILDAR EAST TALUK IN RESPECT OF SY. NO. 82, EXTENT 1 ACRE 21 GUNTAS, AT KADUGUDI, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK ENTER IN RTC THE PETITIONERS NAME IN COLUMN NO. 9, 12(2) MENTIONED MR IN THE NAMES OF PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11383 WP No. 25933 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. On 17.02.2026, this Court had passed the following order: "Finally, a week's time is granted for complying with office objections. If office objections are not complied with, re-list this matter on 24.02.2026 for dismissal." 2. In spite of the said order, petitioners have not complied with the office objections. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7