Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9316 (UTT)

TAUSEEF AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/441/2023 · 2026-08-12

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010024482023 2026:UHC:7181 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/441/2023 Tauseef Ahmad and another --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and others --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Gaurav Pawar, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Arms licence issued to the petitioner was cancelled vide order dated 23.08.2022, passed by District Magistrate, Haridwar which is under challenge in this writ petition. 3. Learned State Counsel points out that petitioner has filed this petition without availing the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 18 of Arms Act, 1959. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of availability of alternate remedy with liberty to petitioner to file appeal before the appellate authority. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.08.2026 Mahinder UKHC010024482023 2026:UHC:7181