[2026:RJ-JP:24681] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6503/2026 URN: CRLMB / 11685U / 2026 1. Arbaj Khan S/o Jamshed, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bhuwapur Gadhi, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). 2. Sahil S/o Rajjak, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kheda, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 03/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 18.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kama, District Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.556/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioners were rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.41/2026, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(A) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature and [2026:RJ-JP:24681] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6503/2026] only one complainant has been registered against Arbaj Khan on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and the total amount involved is approximately Rs.17,000/- and there are only two complainant against Sahil on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and the total amount involved is approximately Rs.50,000/-. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as the accused are in custody since 01.04.2026. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of investigation/trial is likely to take a considerable time; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely (i) Arbaj Khan S/o Jamshed and (ii) Sahil S/o Rajjak arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.41/2026, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, shall be [2026:RJ-JP:24681] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6503/2026] released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 16/KRATIKA