IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.6970 of 2026 Decided on: 08.05.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Santosh Kumari ....Petitioner Versus Union of India. & Ors …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Narender Thakur, Central Govt. Counsel for respondent No.1. Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 4 and 5. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Narender Thakur, learned Central Government Counsel, Ms. Shreya Chauhan, learned counsel and Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General , appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - respondents. 2. Keeping in view the grievance raised by the petitioner and the relief prayed for by her, there is no requirement to call for reply from the respondents. The matter has accordingly been heard at this stage. 3. The case set up is that respondent-State issued a notification on 08.06.2020 constituting a Committee to resolve and sort out all issues including the issues of assessing damage occurred to the private lands, buildings and structures beyond the right of way due to construction of four laning projects of respondent-National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) in the State of Himachal Pradesh. NHAI started construction for four laning/ widening/ maintenance and operation of NH-154 Pathankot-Mandi section in revenue Village Shahpur, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. Petitioner’s land situated in Village 39 Miles, Mohal Shahpur, Patwar Circle Shahpur, Kanungo Circle Rihlu, District Kangra comprised in Khata No. 634/598, Khatauni No. 794/773 and Khasra No.2361/1802/1554 was acquired by the NHAI for the purpose of construction of the aforesaid road. Petitioner alleges that because of - 3 - construction work of the aforesaid highway having not been carried out in a scientific manner, her courtyard, walls of two rooms of her house adjoining to the aforesaid acquired land, have also been damaged. Petitioner’s house/land that has not been acquired, has been rendered unsafe and inhabitable. Petitioner’s representation preferred to the respondents including one submitted on 03.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) has not been redressed. Petitioner has also requested therein for valuation of the damages to her house/land adjoining to her land that was acquired by the NHAI through the Committee constituted under notification dated 08.06.2020, but till date, petitioner’s case has not been placed before the Committee. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied in case respondent No.5 is directed to place case of the petitioner/representations preferred by her including dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) before the Committee constituted under notification dated 08.06.2020 for appropriate action in accordance with law. 5. Taking note of the fact that there does exist a notification dated 08.06.2020 issued by the State of Himachal Pradesh (Annexure P-5) for resolving the issues, such like the - 4 - ones raised in the present writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.5 to send the case of the petitioner for consideration before the aforesaid Committee within a period of two weeks from today, whereafter, the Committee shall consider and take appropriate action and decision on the issues in accordance with law, within eight weeks thereafter. Copy of decision be conveyed to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 08, 2026 R.Atal