Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9313 (CHH)

SMT. MAMTA DIWAKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9184/2022 · 2026-04-29

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20157 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9184 of 2022 * - Smt. Mamta Diwakar W/o M.R. Diwakar Aged About 43 Years R/o Maharana Pratap Ward, Mungeli, Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector Cum District Mission Director Mungeli Collectorate Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer Mungeli Collectorate Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 5 - Kumudani Ekka Government Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya Chatarkhar Tahsil Mungeli District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 6 - Jyoti Dindore Government Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya Chatarkhar Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Chetna Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Rajnish Singh Baghel, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 4/ State : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 30/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 Hon’ble Court may be kind and gracious enough to call for the records of the case from the respondents. 10.2 Hon’ble Court may be kind be pleased to call for the records of the case from the office of the respondents and Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.30 19:37:14 +0530 2 direct the respondent no. 4 to give the charge of Assistant Hostel Superintendent of Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya to the petitioner in place of respondent no. 5 by issuance of writ of mandamus or any other writ/writs, order/orders of direction/directions. 10.3 Any other relief/relief’s which Hon’ble court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.” 2. Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/ respondents No. 1 to 4 would submit that respondent No. 6 was in charge of Hostel Superintendent of Kasturba Gandhi Girl Awasi School, Chartkhar, Tehsil Mungeli. He would submit that when respondent 6 went on leave, respondent No. 4 handed over charge of said hostel to the respondent No. 5 and against said order/decision of respondent No. 4, this petition has been filed by the petitioner on the ground that the respondent No. 5 is junior to the petitioner as she was appointed in the year 2011, whereas the petitioner was appointed in the year 1998. It is contended by Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi that the said order/decision whereby charge of hostel was handed to the respondent No. 5, has already been cancelled and charge of hostel has again been handed over to the respondent No. 6. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was aggrieved with the order/decision taken by respondent No. 4, whereby the charge of hostel was handed over to the respondent No. 5, who is admittedly junior to the petitioner and subsequently the said order has been cancelled, therefore, in my opinion, nothing survives for adjudication into the matter. Accordingly, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti