1 2026:CGHC:20073-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 134 of 2020 1 - Smt. Chamelibai Gopal W/o Late Narayan Prasad Gopal Aged About 55 Years R/o Barpali Chowk, Yadav Mohalla, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Subhadra Gopal D/o Late Narayan Prasad Gopal Aged About 27 Years R/o Barpali Chowk, Yadav Mohalla, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Suruchi Gopal D/o Late Narayan Prasad Gopal Aged About 25 Years R/o Barpali Chowk, Yadav Mohalla, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Diksha Gopal D/o Late Narayan Prasad Gopal Aged About 23 Years R/o Barpali Chowk, Yadav Mohalla, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Durgeshwar Gopal S/o Late Narayan Prasad Gopal Aged About 21 Years R/o Barpali Chowk, Yadav Mohalla, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - Nageshwar Gopal S/o Late Narayan Prasad Gopal Aged About 19 Years R/o Barpali Chowk, Yadav Mohalla, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Sarita Dewangan W/o Munnalal Aged About 42 Years Caste - Dewangan, R/o Near Manjhali Talab, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Amit Baxy, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Judge Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput, Judge Order on Board 2 30/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellant/s submits that he has no instruction on behalf of appellant. 2. In the absence of any instruction on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the present first appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge Jyoti