Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9309 (RAJ)

MAHAVIR S/O SHRI NANDLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9131/2026 · 2026-07-06

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25111] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9131/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16706U / 2026 Mahavir S/o Shri Nandlal, R/o Kankra, P.s. Ayana, District Kota (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9549/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17732U / 2026 Abhishek S/o Omprakash, R/o Vijaypura, Ps Ayana, District Kota (Raj.) (Presently Confined At District Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shamsuddin Ansari Mr. Pranav Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/07/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.198/2026 registered at Police Station Itawa, District Kota Rural for offences under Section 305(d) of BNS, 2023. 2. Since all these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. 3. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:25111] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9131/2026] 4. Learned counsels for the petitioners contend that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. The allegations levelled against the present petitioners are that they committed the theft of an idol from the temple and caused damage to it. Petitioners are behind the bars since 24.05.2026 without any criminal past. The matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications of the petitioners. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Mahavir S/o Shri Nandlal & Abhishek S/o Omprakash be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/53