TAHIR @ LANGDA S/O MAUJA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9511/2026 · 2026-07-03
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9307 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9307 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:24874] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9511/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17624U / 2026
1. Tahir @ Langda S/o Mauja, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kakrala, Ps Sikari District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)
2. Salim S/o Mauja, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kakrala, Ps Sikari District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 03/07/2026
1. The petitioners has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.166/2026 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 3, 4, 8 of RBA Act, 1995 and Sections 4 and 25 of Arms Act, 1959.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the present petitioner is that 1 kg of beef was recovered from their conscious possession without having any legal licence or valid permit. They submit that the prime accused
[2026:RJ-JP:24874] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9511/2026] Juned who has been named in the FIR has been released on bail by this Court on 22.05.2026. Petitioners are behind the bars since 29.05.2026 without any criminal past. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Tahir @ Langda S/o Mauja and Salim S/o Mauja, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/77