1 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 503 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 503 OF 2011 IN WP/4237/2011 DHUPAJI CHAGUNA KAPSE AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ... Adv. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 11/09/2026 ORDER ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) :- . None appears for the petitioner. 2. The affidavit-in-reply is filed by the respondent No.5. It appears that the compensation amount was deposited in the Trial Court and it is assumed that subsequently, the petitioner must have withdrawn the same. 3. As such, nothing survives in the contempt petition, and the same stands disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:42539