RITON MANDAL @ LITON ROY v. STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
I.A.(Crl.)/674/2026 · 2026-07-12
Michael Zothankhuma, Rajesh Mazumdar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9304 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9304 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010133472026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/674/2026 RITON MANDAL @ LITON ROY SON OF SRI RAI MOHAN MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NIZ LAWKHOWA, POLICE STATION RUPAHIHAT, DISTRICT NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.
2:BOBY BORA WIFE OF NABAJYOTI BORA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NIZ LAWKHOWA POLICE STATION RUPAHIHAT DISTRICT- NAGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T K DAS, A ZAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER 13.07.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard A. Khan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T.K. Das,
Page No.# 2/2
learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 20 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned.
3. Accordingly, the delay of 20 days is condoned.
4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant