Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9300 (GAU)

ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED v. CENTRAL TRANSMISSION UTILITY OF INDIA LIMITED AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/3563/2026 · 2026-07-12

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010139822026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3563/2026 ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND A WHOLLY-OWNED UNDERTAKING OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781001, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (LAW). VERSUS CENTRAL TRANSMISSION UTILITY OF INDIA LIMITED AND 4 ORS , A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SAUDAMINI, 1ST FLOOR, PLOT NO. 2, SECTOR - 29, GURUGRAM, HARYANA-122001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT STATE BANK BHAVAN MADAME CAMA ROAD MUMBAI PIN-400021 MAHARASHTRA 3:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA NEW GUWAHATI BRANCH MRD ROAD BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI PIN-781021 ASSAM. Page No.# 2/2 4:NERGS-I POWER TRANSMISSION LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT CORE-4 SCOPE COMPLEX 7 LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 110003 5:THE CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 6TH 7TH AND 8TH FLOORS TOWER B WORLD TRADE CENTRE NAUROJI NAGAR NEW DELHI-11002 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P N GOSWAMI, SR. ADV., MR. K P PATHAK,MR BHARGAV DAS,MR. I KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 13.07.2026 Shri B. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by efflux of time and certain developments, the matter has become infructuous. He accordingly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the same. In view of the aforesaid submission writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant