Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 93 (HP)

RAM KRISHAN MEHTA v. STATE OF HP

/35/2026 · 2026-02-24

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Criminal Revision No.35 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.02.2026 _______________________________________________________ Ram Krishan Mehta …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1. For the Petitioner: Mr. Parv Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to pursue the case before learned trial Court. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge February 24, 2026 (sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?