Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9078 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State and perused the record.
2. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent no.2 to decide Case No.10101 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202505440110101 expeditiously.
3. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. March 18, 2026 Pramod Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Pratap Singh, Sangeeta Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Ghanshyam Ray .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad